EDTECH: How does a cloud-managed architecture enable AI-native networks to leverage greater telemetry?
WILBURN: For years, institutions have relied on premises-based, wireless LAN controllers. We’ve moved that “brain” into the cloud and now provide it as a service. The data plane stays local, but the management and control plane move to the cloud, enabling a rapid response no matter how many access points are deployed. Similarly, the network management console can be a challenge and an expense. With the cloud, all you need is a browser, and we can scale up resources to ensure the network is responsive. The cloud also enables us to handle the telemetry we get: 150 states from every device, every minute. AI is only as good as the data it acts on, and the old wireless LAN controllers don’t have enough CPU or storage to handle the amount of data we need to leverage AI effectively.
Recently, we added a digital twin to our AI engine: Marvis Minis, a riff on Iron Man’s AI assistant J.A.R.V.I.S. Imagine an IT staffer makes a mistake inputting a new security rule at 1:30 a.m. Typically, no one would discover that until the next morning when everyone comes to class and the network is down. Marvis Minis is the equivalent of thousands of users on every wireless AP out there, so at 1:31 a.m., when that rule starts to block traffic it wasn’t supposed to, we’d have 11,000 Minis say, “Wait, there’s a problem.”
EDTECH: How can AI help institutions bolster cybersecurity?
WILBURN: Our solutions have integrated network access control, compatible with eduroam, to automatically determine whether someone is university-affiliated and should be allowed to access the network. We also built in a wireless intrusion detection system to detect and disable any rogue APs through which a bad actor might try to connect to the network.
EDTECH: What misconceptions do you think people have about AI-enabled networks?
WILBURN: Even for IT professionals, it’s hard to believe AI can make this big of a difference. Institutions may want a network upgrade but lack the budget to replace the entire thing, so they might worry about doing a partial upgrade to AI and managing two different systems. But what I hear from customers is that even if they deploy AI only partially, the visibility they gain is such a significant improvement that it’s worth it. Once they see how powerful AI can be, they typically continue to upgrade until they’ve brought their entire network up to the same level, even if they have to do it over more than one budget cycle.
Our customers are reducing their mean time to resolution by 90 percent. With AI, we hope to eliminate at least half of their trouble tickets; in some cases, we’ve eliminated more than 90 percent. IT departments that adopt these solutions generally find that they receive a lot fewer complaints, and users are happier.
Brought to you by: