Close

New Research from CDW on Workplace Friction

Learn how IT leaders are working to build a frictionless enterprise.

Jun 10 2026
Digital Workspace

Why University Classroom Technology is Now a Student Enrollment Strategy

Students are making enrollment decisions based on whether a campus environment matches where they're headed. The implications for IT leaders are bigger than most people realize.

Students increasingly judge institutions by the quality and feel of their learning environment: Do they feel innovative, aspirational, collaborative, modern and high-tech? Increasingly, IT leaders are asking questions akin to those of admissions offices more often now than they did even two years ago: does our campus environment look like the future our students are trying to get to? 

These questions used to be about residence halls and dining. Now they’re about the classroom and learning spaces. And the answers are having a direct impact on whether students choose to enroll, whether they stay and how they gauge whether their investment in a college is “worth it.” Brand perception matters to many students who grew up during an aesthetic-driven social media era — they want to be proud of the spaces where they learn and spend time. 

From where I sit, we're currently seeing this play out in three phases:

Phase 1: Students Expect University Learning Environments to Match Their Ambitions

The data backs this up in ways that should get CIOs’ attention. The EDUCAUSE 2025 Students and Technology Report found that students who perceive their institution as technologically cutting-edge report satisfaction rates of 85%. At institutions students perceive as lagging, that number drops to 34%. That's a 51-point gap driven almost entirely by perception of the environment.

What students are actually describing when they evaluate university classroom technology isn't always the latest hardware. It's about whether a space makes them feel innovative, inspired and aspirational. It’s about whether the environment matches the outcome they're investing in, not a 27-inch CRT on a cart in the corner. Touch, motorized, connected — a hub where they can interact with peers and count on the technology to show up for them. Whether that's a collaboration space in a student center or a classroom they walk into every Tuesday morning, the baseline expectation has moved.

Click the banner below to explore today’s modern learning environments.

 

Phase 2: Classroom Investment Is Now Tied to Enrollment and Retention

CIOs and technology directors can — and should — frame classroom investment for a provost, a board of trustees or an endowment committee as the enrollment argument that it now is. The institutions winning the enrollment conversation right now aren't just the ones with the best programs. They're the ones where the technology makes the whole experience feel worth it.

Higher ed enrollment has declined year over year for quite a while now. Institutions know this and they're building accordingly. Michigan State University is constructing a brand new data and innovation center solely aimed at data sciences. That's a full capital commitment, not a wing down a hallway in the science building. Data science wasn't even a standalone major three years ago. Campuses are redesigning entire spaces to match where the workforce is going because students want to train with the tools they'll actually use in their careers.

That logic started in specialized programs: med schools with simulation labs, robotics and VR. If a medical student is going to do surgery with that equipment in five years, they want to train on it now. But what used to be concentrated in high-prestige or high-investment programs is now spreading across campus. NC State University integrates esports into their media centers, pulling emerging tech into student writing, research and learning hubs in a way that blurs the line between academic spaces and professional preparation. Students in seats equals money on campus. The environments those seats are in are increasingly part of the calculus.

These projects cannot avoid being modern — they are expected to be fully future-proofed at the network and infrastructure level. In short, for newer builds, modern isn’t a buzzword — it’s a baseline requirement.

Phase 3: The Student Experience Has Expanded Well Beyond the Classroom

The third phase is harder to quantify but impossible to ignore. It’s about wayfinding, game day, student unions and athletics venues. Can a student go to a basketball game on a Saturday and feel like the campus is running at the same level as their phone? Can they pay with Apple Pay — an expected part of the student experience for many — find their way without frustration and feel safe?

That convergence — tech-enabled environments that are safe, fun, engaging and easy — is moving from nice-to-have to expected. That's a significant shift from where higher ed has been focused for the past decade, which was almost entirely on lesson capture and whether the mic was loud enough. And the tools driving that broader experience are increasingly the same ones that started in the classroom: collaboration and casting solutions are now the backbone of digital signage and campus-wide engagement spaces, and institutions that treat them as one infrastructure decision rather than separate budget lines are getting further faster.

DISCOVER: How AVoIP modernizes AV systems, reduce costs and future-proofs your campus.

Why the ROI Conversation Has Become Easier for Higher Ed CIOs

Institutions have become much better at building true personas — from faculty to students to university employees — and mapping technology decisions to what those groups actually need. When there's a clear pathway to a defined outcome, the barriers fall faster than most people expect.

Higher ed has also diversified its funding streams in ways that make certain investment conversations almost straightforward. When a grant requires a specific outcome, the question becomes execution, not justification. The harder conversations happen at the edges where purpose isn't crystal clear, or where an institution is chasing what I'd call the bleeding edge: a brand new major, 15 students, two faculty members and the rest of campus still needs buses running on time. Those barriers are real and they're not going away. But as long as the purpose is defined, with student success, faculty effectiveness and program growth as the anchors, the investment tends to follow.

The right question isn't which option is the most impressive. It's whether a given investment satisfies the need, future-proofs the space and can be sustained. A solution that covers 20 rooms well beats a showpiece that covers one room perfectly. That's the framework that actually moves institutions forward.

This article is part of EdTech: Focus on Higher Education’s UniversITy blog series featuring analysis and recommendations from CDW experts.

South_agency/Getty Images