Aug 23 2012

What You May Not Know About Continuous Monitoring

It's essential to cybersecurity, but districts must establish an effective security infrastructure first.

Continuous monitoring is an important part of a school district's cybersecurity efforts. But without establishing an effective security framework first, those efforts may be misspent.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology recently completed a fundamental transformation of the certification and accreditation process into a comprehensive, near real-time security lifecycle process as part of a Risk Management Framework (RMF).

The RMF provides a dynamic six-step approach to managing cybersecurity risk. The strength of the RMF is based on the comprehensive nature of the framework, which focuses as much attention on selecting the right security controls and effectively implementing them as it does on security assessment, authorization and continuous monitoring. The strategy is simple: Build it right, then continuously monitor.

The RMF, when used in conjunction with a three-tiered enterprise risk management approach and broad-based continuous monitoring, provides a comprehensive process for developing, implementing and monitoring a cybersecurity program. Such a program can protect core organizational missions and operational functions from a range of threats, including cyberattacks.

Build a Foundation First

Organizations that begin work on a continuous monitoring program with a narrow focus on security controls at the information system level without first doing some basic investment in strengthening their underlying IT infrastructure face significant problems.

First, they may end up wasting significant resources monitoring inherently weak information systems — in essence, throwing good money after bad. You can check a broken lock on the front door of your house once a day or every hour, but the lock is still broken. Better to fix the lock first, reinforce the doorjamb, and then with the remaining resources, check the lock on an ongoing basis.

Second, premature allocation of resources toward continuous monitoring of security controls for information systems may preclude organizations from investing the resources needed to build stronger, more penetration-resistant systems. Such investments are critical as districts address the advanced persistent threat and cyberattacks associated with sophisticated and well-resourced adversaries. This is especially important for information systems that support critical infrastructure.

Strengthening the IT infrastructure begins with establishing a sound cybersecurity and risk management governance process. Next, organizations must manage the complexity of their IT infrastructures by using enterprise architecture to consolidate, standardize and optimize the current inventory of IT assets, as well as developing "threat aware" mission and business processes.

Organizations also must develop and integrate into their enterprise architecture a security architecture that guides the effective allocation of security controls to their information systems. And finally, organizations must initiate continuous monitoring of all of the above activities to ensure ongoing effectiveness of cybersecurity and risk management governance, mission/business processes, enterprise and security architectures, and security controls deployed within the enterprise.

Failing to deploy continuous monitoring resources in the right sequence and with the right level of effort is potentially very harmful. Continuous monitoring will be most effective when applied across all key components of an organization — from governance to architecture to systems.

<p>James Kegley</p>

More On